I've never been in a league that requires 100% agreement and I honestly think I would never want to. I can live with losing a vote because the majority doesn't agree with me , but not because one owner disagrees with everyone else . The NFL doesn't even require 100%Dangerzone wrote:I feel a scoring change would still take a 100% agreement in change though.........anyone disagree with that point? I may be able to be persuaded.....but not so far.
PPR for RBs
- Achon44
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
- Team Name: Bring the Pain
- Location: The Land
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
The other thing to consider is that this league is different than a true dynasty league. Ever player is under contract only for a certain period of time, not for life, so if we ever came up with a rule that really effected the balance of the league. Teams are able to quickly adjust via free agency. This particular change is very minimal IMO but in the event we actually voted on a huge change teams can still adjust.
The NFL tweaks there rules and/or points of emphasis in the off season and there are teams that benefit more than others but the league as a whole manages to adjust.
The NFL tweaks there rules and/or points of emphasis in the off season and there are teams that benefit more than others but the league as a whole manages to adjust.
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm
Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...
- Boyz II Men
- Veteran
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
- Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB
- Achon44
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
- Team Name: Bring the Pain
- Location: The Land
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Its funny that the you are insinuating the rest of us didn't even look at the scoring system before we "auctioned". I like the scoring system we had in 2007 I know it works well, as I've used it for the past 5 years in another league, but a lot of people wanted PPR for RB's. After hearing dialog back and forth, we voted, most people agreed to add PPR for RB's. Not even just a simple majority either. We still have a couple hours until the poll is finished but so far, 75% of the league has no issue with adding .25 PPR for RB's.Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
That's not going to happen, once "the people have spoke" so to speak and that's how we, as a league, will go.Boyz II Men wrote: I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm
Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...
- bonscott
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
- Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
- Location: West Michigan
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
So I'm guessing that this has passed? 10 yes plus 2 abstentions vs. 4 no would be exactly 75% for.
Scott
- Boyz II Men
- Veteran
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
- Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Its funny that the you are insinuating the rest of us didn't even look at the scoring system before we "auctioned". I like the scoring system we had in 2007 I know it works well, as I've used it for the past 5 years in another league, but a lot of people wanted PPR for RB's. After hearing dialog back and forth, we voted, most people agreed to add PPR for RB's. Not even just a simple majority either. We still have a couple hours until the poll is finished but so far, 75% of the league has no issue with adding .25 PPR for RB's.braven112 wrote:Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
I was not insinuating everyone didn't look at the scoring rules. I'm sure everyone paid alot of attention
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB
- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Go Dark Magicians!!!!!
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm
Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...
- yugimoto
- Veteran
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:03 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
- Team Name: Dark Magicians of Chaos
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK.braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!!
- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sure everyone paid alot of attention
Just referring to how you were able to overcome public enemy #1 (the great Boyz II Men team) and win the league championship.yugimoto wrote:I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK.braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!!
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm
Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...
- Boyz II Men
- Veteran
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
- Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Magicians it's always good to have supportersbraven112 wrote:Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sure everyone paid alot of attentionJust referring to how you were able to overcome public enemy #1 (the great Boyz II Men team) and win the league championship.yugimoto wrote:I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK.braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!!
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB
- yugimoto
- Veteran
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:03 am
- Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
- Team Name: Dark Magicians of Chaos
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
Especially when that supporter is the CommishBoyz II Men wrote:
Magicians it's always good to have supporters
- braven112
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
- Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Contact:
Re: PPR for RBs
It passed
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm
Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests