VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Use this forum if you have any rules that you want changed or if you have a new idea for the league.
Post Reply

Should we allow compensatory draft picks on tagged players to be the original pick or higher?

Poll ended at Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:56 pm

Yes
9
100%
No
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 9

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by braven112 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:56 pm

The constitution would be updated to what we have below...

The compensatory draft picks must be the original draft picks (or the next closest, draft pick that is higher that the original, is no longer owned) of the team that signed the tagged player.

For example, If your original pick was 1.15, but you now own 1.12 & 1.09 and bid on one player you would give up 1.12.

If a team owns more than one pick in a round they can bid on multiple tagged players of different types. The higher picks would be used for the franchise tagged players, then transition players and lastly RFA.

So if a team has the same 2 first round picks and bids on a franchise player and a transition player the higher pick (1.09 in this case) would go for the franchise player and the lower pick (1.12) would go for the transition player.
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
Achon44
Pro Bowler
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
Team Name: Bring the Pain
Location: The Land
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by Achon44 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:51 pm

If my origional pick was 1.15, but I now own 1.12 & 1.09 and bid on one player which pick would I give up? I'm assuming 1.12, but we might need something written that makes that crystal clear.
Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by braven112 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 11:06 pm

Achon44 wrote:If my origional pick was 1.15, but I now own 1.12 & 1.09 and bid on one player which pick would I give up? I'm assuming 1.12, but we might need something written that makes that crystal clear.
Excellent point, is the updated version crystal clear?
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
Achon44
Pro Bowler
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
Team Name: Bring the Pain
Location: The Land
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by Achon44 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:49 am

:sweet:
Image

User avatar
bonscott
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by bonscott » Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:51 am

Interesting....my take on it was that if you no longer owned your original pick that the highest pick you have would be used, thus 1.09 in the example. Doing it the other way might be harder to track (since we would somehow need to keep the original order listed somewhere for reference), but no biggy I guess, we can do that.

I'd vote yes either way cause the change needs to happen.

The updated wording is still a bit confusing although the example is clear.

Current new wording:
The compensatory draft picks must be the original draft picks (or the next closest, draft pick that is higher that the original, is no longer owned) of the team that signed the tagged player.
Perhaps a clearer statement:
The compensatory draft picks must be the original draft picks or if the original pick is no longer owned, the next closest draft pick that is higher then the original or highest draft pick available if lower, of the team that signed the tagged player.
This would also cover the example of if my original is say 1.10 but now I own 1.12 and 1.15, 1.12 would be the highest pick available and would be used.
Scott

Image

User avatar
bonscott
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by bonscott » Tue May 12, 2009 10:51 am

So I take it that this one passed? :wink:
Scott

Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by braven112 » Fri May 15, 2009 9:22 pm

Yep and now part of the constitution. :sweet:
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
yugimoto
Veteran
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:03 am
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: Dark Magicians of Chaos
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by yugimoto » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:14 am

Brandon,

I was just looking through the constitution getting preapred to bring on the new owner we talked about and I noticed that the constitution still has the following statement in the Player Tags section:

"The compensatory draft picks must be the original draft picks of the team that signed the tagged player."

Just wanted to point that out, since based on the voting and the passed change, this looks like it needs to be updated.

DMOC
Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: VOTE!! Compensatory draft picks on tagged players change

Post by braven112 » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:19 pm

Thanks for the heads up, this part has been removed.
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest