PPR for RBs

Use this forum if you have any rules that you want changed or if you have a new idea for the league.
User avatar
Achon44
Pro Bowler
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
Team Name: Bring the Pain
Location: The Land
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by Achon44 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:17 pm

Dangerzone wrote:I feel a scoring change would still take a 100% agreement in change though.........anyone disagree with that point? I may be able to be persuaded.....but not so far.
I've never been in a league that requires 100% agreement and I honestly think I would never want to. I can live with losing a vote because the majority doesn't agree with me :angry:, but not because one owner disagrees with everyone else :wall:. The NFL doesn't even require 100%
Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by braven112 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:01 pm

The other thing to consider is that this league is different than a true dynasty league. Ever player is under contract only for a certain period of time, not for life, so if we ever came up with a rule that really effected the balance of the league. Teams are able to quickly adjust via free agency. This particular change is very minimal IMO but in the event we actually voted on a huge change teams can still adjust.

The NFL tweaks there rules and/or points of emphasis in the off season and there are teams that benefit more than others but the league as a whole manages to adjust.
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
Boyz II Men
Veteran
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by Boyz II Men » Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:59 am

I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.

I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB

User avatar
Achon44
Pro Bowler
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:30 am
Favorite NFL Team: Cleveland Browns
Team Name: Bring the Pain
Location: The Land
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by Achon44 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:01 am

Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
:?
Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by braven112 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:46 am

Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
:rofl: Its funny that the you are insinuating the rest of us didn't even look at the scoring system before we "auctioned". :dunno: I like the scoring system we had in 2007 I know it works well, as I've used it for the past 5 years in another league, but a lot of people wanted PPR for RB's. After hearing dialog back and forth, we voted, most people agreed to add PPR for RB's. Not even just a simple majority either. We still have a couple hours until the poll is finished but so far, 75% of the league has no issue with adding .25 PPR for RB's.
Boyz II Men wrote: I just think if we want to change scoring rules then we should just re-start the league. I'm sure everyone can agree that the setup of the auction settings didn't allow for much auction strategy...Just throwing that out there
That's not going to happen, once "the people have spoke" so to speak and that's how we, as a league, will go. :wink:
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
bonscott
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by bonscott » Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:02 am

So I'm guessing that this has passed? 10 yes plus 2 abstentions vs. 4 no would be exactly 75% for.
Scott

Image

User avatar
Boyz II Men
Veteran
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by Boyz II Men » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:30 pm

braven112 wrote:
Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sorry I used the word draft instead of auction. My money was allocated just like a cheatsheet. The values ended up being more than I expected but I did have a cheatsheet. I grabbed RBs like Lendale White and Fred Taylor because they weren't expected to be heavy contributors in the passing game and more TD friendly. This strategy also made me focus more on WRs because I felt they should score more and would serve me better at the Flex position.
:rofl: Its funny that the you are insinuating the rest of us didn't even look at the scoring system before we "auctioned". :dunno: I like the scoring system we had in 2007 I know it works well, as I've used it for the past 5 years in another league, but a lot of people wanted PPR for RB's. After hearing dialog back and forth, we voted, most people agreed to add PPR for RB's. Not even just a simple majority either. We still have a couple hours until the poll is finished but so far, 75% of the league has no issue with adding .25 PPR for RB's.


I was not insinuating everyone didn't look at the scoring rules. I'm sure everyone paid alot of attention :rofl:
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by braven112 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:00 pm

Go Dark Magicians!!!!! :goteam:
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
yugimoto
Veteran
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:03 am
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: Dark Magicians of Chaos
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by yugimoto » Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:58 pm

braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!! :goteam:
I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK. :?
Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by braven112 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:09 am

Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sure everyone paid alot of attention :rofl:
yugimoto wrote:
braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!! :goteam:
I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK. :?
Just referring to how you were able to overcome public enemy #1 (the great Boyz II Men team) :razz: and win the league championship. :yippee:
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

User avatar
Boyz II Men
Veteran
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:34 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: BOYZ II MEN
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by Boyz II Men » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:40 am

braven112 wrote:
Boyz II Men wrote:I'm sure everyone paid alot of attention :rofl:
yugimoto wrote:
braven112 wrote:Go Dark Magicians!!!!! :goteam:
I admit I am a bit confused by this post , but ... OK. :?
Just referring to how you were able to overcome public enemy #1 (the great Boyz II Men team) :razz: and win the league championship. :yippee:
Magicians it's always good to have supporters :yippee: :yippee: :rofl:
My team sure looks good on paper...even without a stud RB

User avatar
yugimoto
Veteran
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:03 am
Favorite NFL Team: Tennessee Titans
Team Name: Dark Magicians of Chaos
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by yugimoto » Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:29 pm

Boyz II Men wrote:
Magicians it's always good to have supporters :yippee: :yippee: :rofl:
Especially when that supporter is the Commish :lol:
Image

User avatar
bonscott
Hall of Famer
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:09 am
Favorite NFL Team: Chicago Bears
Team Name: Amish Rakefighters
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by bonscott » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:36 am

So Commish, did this pass or not?
Scott

Image

User avatar
braven112
Site Admin
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:05 pm
Favorite NFL Team: Seattle Seahawks
Team Name: Pacific Pigskins
Location: Seattle, Washington
Contact:

Re: PPR for RBs

Post by braven112 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:55 pm

It passed
Image
by griblets » Thu May 17, 2012 5:47 pm

Usually, when the commissioner has a good team, these are the kind of polls you see...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests